Home Page

Il delitto Bennett

The Bennet murder

Il 29 settembre del 1929 in una villa di Kansas City si verificò il più famoso fatto di sangue della storia del Bridge.

Vittima fu il trentaseienne e ricco profumiere John S. Bennett, ed esecutrice fu la di lui moglie signora Myrtle Bennett.

Il delitto avvenne durante una partita libera che si stava disputando con una coppia di coniugi amici della sfortunata coppia, i signori Myrna e Charles Hoffman.

 

Myrtle Bennet

 Il signor Bennett che, sembra fosse decisamente più scarso della moglie nell'arte del bridge, al termine di una Manche a picche da lui perduta, fu insultato pesantemente dalla moglie. Ne seguì un aspro diverbio tra coniugi e, nonostante il prodigarsi dei signori Hofmann che cercavano in ogni modo di sedare la discussione e continuare il gioco, la lite crebbe di intensità tanto che ad un certo punto, John cominciò a scrollare pesantemente Myrtle per le spalle mentre lei continuava a canzonarlo licitando continuamente la litania "Nobody but a bum would hit a woman".

 A questo punto, Myrtle dichiarò che solo un degenerato può strapazzare la propria moglie in presenza degli amici, ed il maritò lasciando il salotto dichiarò che avrebbe passato la notte in albergo per poi lasciare la città il giorno dopo.

 La signora Hoffman aveva nel frattempo abbandonato la scena del diverbio ed aspettava sull'uscio di casa Bennett, suo marito che era rimasto in salotto, forse l'intento di consolare John o, forse, soltanto per congedarsi da sua moglie.

 La signora Bennett si recò allora nella camera da letto della madre dove prese una rivoltella e ritornando nel salotto vide il marito, che nel frattempo aveva frettolosamente raccolto i suoi effetti personali in una borsa da viaggio e che stava scusandosi con il signor Hoffman per l'accaduto.

Non appena John Bennett vide la rivoltella nelle mani della moglie, corse a rifugiarsi nel bagno, ma Myrtle implacabile lo seguì e gli sparò due colpi che risultarono mortali.

Quando la polizia arrivò nella villa dei coniugi Bennett, trovò una moglie distrutta e sinceramente piangente le spoglie del marito.

 

James Reed

 

John Bennet

 La vicenda ebbe un tale scalpore che la famosa Manche a picche del delitto Bennett fece il giro del mondo ed è ancora oggi riportata in tute le opere enciclopediche che riguardano il Bridge.

 La Manche a picche del delitto Bennett, fu commentata financo dal grande Ely Culbertson, che mise in luce gli errori di gioco, che in effetti il povero John aveva commesso al tavolo.

 Al processo, che ebbe inizio nel febbraio del 1931, Myrtle fu difesa da un avvocato formidabile James A. Reed per tre volte senatore del Missouri che sostenne, avvalorato dai continui pianti in aula dell'imputata, che i colpi partirono accidentalmente.

 Il processo si protrasse per un paio di mesi e al momento del verdetto finale la giuria rimase riunita ben 8 ore, e c'è chi dice che almeno tre ne furono spese per insegnare il gioco del Bridge ad alcuni giurati!

 La conclusione della Giuria fu che si trattava di morte accidentale.

 In seguito a questa discutibile sentenza, Myrtle Bennett poté addirittura incassare i 30.000$ della polizza con la quale il marito si era assicurato in caso di morte!

La signora Bennett, pur se con qualche giustificabile difficoltà  a trovare dei partner disposti a fronteggiarla, continuò a giocare a Bridge fino al momento della sua morte e gestì per tutta la sua vita una catena di piccoli alberghi che le diedero il benessere economico.

Alla sua morte avvenuta nel 1992 alla veneranda età di 97 anni, il suo patrimonio valutato in un milione di dollari andò agli eredi del marito ucciso tanti anni prima, non avendone lei di diretti.

Se vuoi prendere visione della famosa Manche a picche del delitto Bennett

The Bridge Murder case, also known as the Bridge Table Murder case was the trial of Myrtle A. Bennett, born on March 20th, 1895, in Tillar, Arkansas, a Kansas City housewife, for the murder of her husband John G. Bennett over a game of contract bridge in September 1929.

Myrtle and John spent much of Sunday, September 29th, 1929, with their upstairs neighbors, Charles and Mayme Hofman.

 

Myrna Hoffman

The husbands played a round of golf at the Indian Hills Country Club that morning, and then went back to the links that afternoon with their wives joining them. At dusk, they returned to the Bennett apartment at 902 Ward Parkway in the Country Club District of Kansas City. After sharing dinner, they sat down to a game of bridge in the Bennett living room, the couples playing as partners, the Hofmans versus the Bennetts. After midnight, as the Hofmans began to pull ahead, the Bennetts began to bicker. In the ultimate hand, John failed to make his four spades contract and Myrtle, frustrated by the failure, called him “a bum bridge player”. A handsome perfume salesman for the Richard Hudnut Company, John reacted harshly. He stood and slapped her in the face several times, and announced he was leaving. He said he would spend the night in a motel in Saint Joseph, Missouri. As he packed his bag, and moved from room to room, he mocked his wife. Myrtle told the Hofmans, “Only a cur would strike a woman in front of guests.”

After an ongoing argument, John Bennett went to pack a suitcase as he told Myrtle to retrieve the handgun he typically carried on the road for protection. Myrtle walked down the hall to the bedroom of her mother, Alice Adkins. Still sobbing, Myrtle reached into a drawer with linens and pulled out his .32 Colt automatic, and walked into the den. There, she brushed past Charles Hofman and in a moment, the sound of gunfire filled the apartment. She shot at John's back twice in the bathroom of the apartment. John escaped into the hallway, but fell to the ground in their living room.

 

Charles Hoffman

 The case caught the public imagination, and was subject to press attention by the New York Journal, not for the trial itself, but for the bridge game. The case was a media sensation and a flashpoint in the bridge craze sweeping the nation. The Journal invited speculation from bridge experts, including Sidney Lenz, on the game, what hands had been played, and whether different play, or alternative hands, would have prevented the murder.

 This speculation was no more than speculation, however. None of the people present in the apartment at the time later recalled exactly what the hands were.

 When the case came to trial, Myrtle Bennett was defended by former U.S. Senator James A. Reed.

 Myrtle Bennett’s murder trial, in the court of Judge Ralph S. Latshaw, began on February 23, 1931 and lasted eleven days. She was defended by attorney James A. Reed, former three-term U.S. Senator and onetime Democratic presidential candidate. Raised by Boss Tom Pendergast’s political machine in Kansas City (same as the judge and prosecutor in the Bennett trial), Reed was a riveting public speaker and trial attorney who put on a dramatic courtroom performance for the widow Bennett. Among other things, Reed showed jurors that John Bennett had struck his wife before.

High society women in Kansas City, many of them bridge players, turned out in their furs and boas to hear Myrtle Bennett’s story and to watch what was believed to be Reed’s final criminal trial. Throughout the trial, Johnson County prosecutor James A. Page objected to Reed’s tactics, once during the defense lawyer’s tearful opening statement. Seeing Reed and Myrtle Bennett weep, Page cynically asked Latshaw to pause the trial long enough to give “counsel for the defense and his client a chance to finish their cry.” Reed lashed back, “I wish I could be as cold-blooded about it as some in this courtroom.”

Reed constructed an elaborate defense. He set up separate defenses for Myrtle Bennett: accidental, emotional insanity, self-defense and also qualified self defense which meant too much force was used by the defendant to repel an assault. Reed told jurors that John Bennett sought to take the gun from his wife and they scuffled for possession of it, and that he was shot twice – once in the back, and once beneath his left armpit – during the scuffle. Reed and his fellow defense attorney, J. Francis O'Sullivan, even pantomimed the shooting three times before the jury box, with Reed portraying Myrtle and O’Sullivan playing John.

During the trial, the prosecutor, James R. Page, had sharp exchanges with the judge, Ralph S. Latshaw; became angry at Charles Hofman when his testimony differed from that given to police the night of the killing and two weeks later in a preliminary hearing; and was also angry at Mayme Hofman for her memory lapses. Defense attorney Reed broke into tears at one point. The judge ruled against the introduction of the prosecution's star witness, one of John Bennett's relatives, because the prosecution had called him as a rebuttal witness, instead of a witness offering direct testimony. The jury's verdict was that Myrtle Bennett was not guilty of murder.

Page and Reed sparred often, prompting the judge to send the jury from the courtroom over and over. When Page later tried to surprise Reed by introducing a star witness – Byrd Rice, John’s nephew – during rebuttal, Judge Latshaw excoriated the prosecutor for failing to endorse Rice on his original list of witnesses, and thereby failing to allow the defense its right to hear Rice’s story before the trial. Latshaw would not allow Rice to testify. Later, Rice told reporters what he had intended to testify, that his aunt Myrtle Bennett had walked him through her apartment six weeks after the killing and narrated how she had chased John through the rooms of the apartment with a pistol in her hand. She told Rice that she had fired at him twice from the den and twice more in the living room, the last bullet striking him in the back as he reached for the front door. But the jury never heard this story.

 

The Giury Process Bennett

On March 6, after eight hours of deliberations, the jury delivered a Not Guilty verdict. Reed only wondered why jurors took so long. Page’s assistant, John Hill, said, “It looks like an open season on husbands.”

Ely Culbertson, the Barnum of the bridge movement, watched the trial closely from New York. Culbertson used the Bennett tragedy to his advantage. He sold bridge and himself, telling housewives that the game was a great way to defuse the marital tensions pent-up in daily life. He told housewives that, at the bridge table, they could be their husbands’ equal, and more.

Culbertson wrote about the killing and trial in his new magazine, The Bridge World.

In packed halls on the lecture circuit, he analyzed the so-called “Fatal Hand” – even as he knew it was totally fabricated. (None of the players remembered the distribution of cards.) In lectures, Culbertson suggested that if only the Bennetts had been playing the Culbertson System of bidding, then 36-year-old John Bennett might still be alive.

Only 35 years old at the time of her acquittal, Myrtle Bennett lived for another 61 years, dying at the age of 96 in Miami, Fla. in January 1992. She had moved into obscurity soon after the trial, her name fading from headlines. She never remarried, nor did she have children. According to The Devil’s Tickets, after World War 2 and throughout the 1950s, Myrtle Bennett worked as executive head of housekeeping at the elegant Hotel Carlyle in New York City, living alone there in an apartment. At the Carlyle, she developed friendships with the rich and famous, including actors Mary Pickford and her husband Buddy Rogers, and also Henry Ford II.

The widow Bennett later traveled the world, working for a hotel chain, and played bridge until nearly the end of her life. In an interview with author Pomerantz, Myrtle Bennett’s cousin, Carolyn Scruggs of Arkansas, said Mrs. Bennett never spoke with her about the shooting. Once, though, Ms. Scruggs told Mrs. Bennett, “I sometimes think of your life –“ But Myrtle Bennett interrupted, and said,, “Well, my dear, it was a great tragedy and a great mistake.” Scruggs stammered to say, “I guess I want you to know that I understand it.” But Myrtle Bennett said, “No, my dear, you don’t understand it.”

At the time of her 1992 death, Myrtle Bennett’s estate was valued at more than $1 million. With no direct descendants, she left the lion’s share of her money to family members of John Bennett, the husband she had killed more than six decades before.

If you want to see Bennett's hand

Ese día Myrtle y John Bennett y Myrna y Charles Hoffman, del exclusivo y elegante distrito sur de Kansas City, pasaron la jornada juntos. Por la mañana jugaron al golf y al mediodía volvieron al apartamento para almorzar. Discutieron qué podían hacer para pasar la tarde y decidieron jugar al bridge. Una agradable tarde de domingo con los amigos.

Todo era normal pero, al poco tiempo de juego, los acontecimientos tomaron un desgraciado rumbo. A las dos horas de juego surgieron acaloradas y trágicas discu-siones. Y eso que las apuestas eran pequeñas y ninguna pareja esperaba perder o ganar más de 0,50 dólares en toda la sesión. Los Bennett fueron pronto por delante pero los Hoffman comenzaron a recuperarse; y entre los Bennett las críticas se hicieron cada vez más intensas.

En un momento determinado, John Bennett, con una mano débil, hizo una apertura de un ♠; Mr. Hoffman intervino a dos ♦ y la señora Bennett apoyó agre-sivamente a 4 ♠. Y extendió un muerto bastante acep-table; pero su marido hizo dos down. Esto enfureció a su esposa, que llegó a llamarle bum bridge player ("ano o culo de los jugadores de bridge"). John le replicó y las discusiones se agriaron; situación que duró varios minutos. Los Hoffman intentaron parar la disputa pero la pelea llegó a ser tan fuerte que Mr. Bennett agarró el brazo de Myrtle a través de la mesa y la abofeteó varias veces. Ésta rompió a llorar vociferando que sólo un bum podía abofetear a una mujer. John abatió de golpe la mesa de bridge contra la pared y dijo que iba a pasar la noche en un hotel y que mañana… "¡me voy de la ciudad!".

Los Hoffman decidieron irse; sin embargo, Charly se quedó para intentar calmar a Mr. Bennett, que se agi-taba de un lado a otro como un loco.

A partir de aquí los relatos divergieron. La acusación afirmaba que la señora Bennett corrió a la habitación de su madre, sacó el arma de la cómoda y volvió al dormitorio donde encontró a John. Éste, viendo blan-dir el arma a su mujer, huyó al cuarto de baño. Myrtle disparó un par de tiros a través de la puerta del baño, que fallaron el blanco. John salió del cuarto de baño e intentó huir, pero Myrtle le disparó dos tiros más que le provocaron la muerte.

La defensa presentó una historia diferente. Mientras John estaba carteando, Myrtle fue a la cocina para preparar alimentos para el temprano desayuno de su marido; y también su equipaje para un viaje de nego-cios a una localidad vecina.

Después volvió a la mesa y se encontró con que no había sido cumplido el contrato, a pesar de que ella había extendido una buena mano. John dijo que ella no debía haber cantado manga; y los reproches resultaban cada vez más intensos de un lado a otro.

Según la defensa, ella pudo haber hecho alguna observación sobre que él era un pobre jugador, pero se vio sorprendida cuando John se levantó y le abofeteó cinco o seis veces.

Según los testimonios de la defensa, la partida se deshizo, y Myrtle decidió ir a terminar el equipaje de su marido. Éste le había pedido que cogiera el revolver, porque quería llevarlo en el viaje, y ella fue a la habitación de su madre a buscarlo. Cuando Myrtle volvió, su marido estaba alterado, meneándose continuamente. Cuando John la vio con el arma en la mano intentó arrebatársela. Entonces ella tropezó y el arma se disparó accidentalmente dos veces. Myrtle comenzó a gritar histéricamente, diciendo: "¡Preferiría seryo la muerta!". De esta manera la encontró la policía cuando llegó a su casa; y con el arma humeando, de los disparos recientes.

Myrtle fue acusada de la muerte de su marido, pero quedó tan desolada que se puso demasiado enferma e incapacitada para comparecer a juicio durante un año.

El caso del homicidio de John Bennett, en una partida de bridge, constituyó la portada de las noticias de febrero de 1931. Ésta fue la época en la que Eli Culberston puso de moda el bridge. La cobertura de los eventos del bridge fue enorme y fomentó des-proporcionadamente el entusiasmo de la gente por el bridge. Los libros de E. Culberston encabezaron las ventas de libros durante todo el año, los de ficción y los de no ficción; y superaron a los autores favoritos de aquella época.

El 22 de febrero de 1931, a los 16 meses, y después de numerosos aplazamientos, el periódico Kansas City Journal tituló en portada "Por fin Mrs. Bennett se presenta al jurado".

El juicio tuvo todos los ingredientes de un gran drama. Los Bennett eran considerados como un pareja fiel, de buena posición económica ("matrimonio bien"), cuyo mayor defecto parecía ser que los dos eran conocidos por sus "fuertes temperamentos".

Pero ¿por qué Myrtle asesinó a su marido en un suntuosamente amueblado apartamento? ¿Se debió solamente a una riña sobre una mano de bridge o había otra causa? ¿Había sido asesinado Mr. Bennett, como sostuvo el fiscal J. R. Paige? ¿Ofue víctima de un disparo accidental, como mantenía el formidable abogado defensor J. A. Reed, senador tres veces por Missouri? ¿Oquizá Mrs. Bennett actuó en defensa propia?

Estas preguntas estaban a punto de ser contestadas, tan pronto como el jurado, formado sólo por hombres, estuviera constituido y se desarrollara el juicio. En último extremo, los hechos hacían que pareciera im-probable que el jurado absolviera a la señora Bennett.

El juicio, sin embargo, fue puro teatro. El drama se convirtió en el epicentro. Lloró la acusada, lloró su madre, lloró el presidente del jurado, y naturalmente el abogado defensor J. A. Reed.

El testigo principal de los acontecimientos y de la acu-sación, Charles Hoffman, fue sometido a un minucioso interrogatorio por parte del fiscal, quien le acusó de haber cambiado a favor de la defensa el testimonio preliminar. Su irritación ante el interrogatorio y sus manifestaciones fueron más bien una ayuda para la acusada; fue un "ausente", en términos procesales.

Con lágrimas en los ojos, el abogado defensor dijo al jurado: "Yo sé lo que John Bennett desearía que hiciera, si él estuviera hoy aquí. Me ordenaría que protegiera a la mujer que amaba y que consolara a la suegra a la que también amaba". Combinando esto con la poca fiabilidad del testigo principal, no resultaba difícil sospechar el veredicto del jurado.

Sin basarse en las pruebas evidentes, así como por el papel negativo de John, el jurado encontró que no se trataba de un "homicidio justificado", como era de esperar, sino de "muerte por accidente". Myrtle fue absuelta.

Hay una circunstancia que llenó de emoción el proceso: cuando una compañía de seguros manifestó que debía a la desconsolada viuda 30.000 dólares, cantidad que cubría el seguro de vida contra la muerte por accidente suscrito por John Bennett.

Si desea ver la mano de Bennett

  Indice

  Index